[Haskell-cafe] Scrap your rolls/unrolls
Sjoerd Visscher
sjoerd at w3future.com
Sat Oct 23 10:05:45 EDT 2010
On Oct 23, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Sebastian Fischer wrote:
>
> I think `Control.Functor.Categorical.CFunctor` is a more natural replacement for functor here. One can define
>
> instance CFunctor (ListF a) ForceCat Hask
>
> and I was hoping that I could define `fold` based on CFunctor but I did not succeed. The usual definition of `fold` is
>
> fold :: Functor f => (f a -> a) -> Fix f -> a
> fold f = f . fmap (fold f)
>
> and I tried to replace this with
>
> fold :: CFunctor f ForceCat Hask => ...
>
> but did not find a combination of type signature and definition that compiled.
The catamorphism lies in the ForceCat category. Also, you can't just pass "a" to "f" because Force a is undefined.
data IdThunk a
type instance Force (IdThunk a) = a
cata :: CFunctor f ForceCat (->) => (f (IdThunk a) -> a) -> ForceCat (FixThunk f) (IdThunk a)
cata alg = ForceCat $ alg . cmap (cata alg)
Then you can define fold as follows:
fold :: CFunctor f ForceCat (->) => (f (IdThunk a) -> a) -> Fix f -> a
fold = unForceCat . cata
Fortunately the IdThunk does not get in the way when defining algebras:
sumAlg :: ListF Int (IdThunk Int) -> Int
sumAlg Nil = 0
sumAlg (Cons a r) = a + r
greetings,
Sjoerd Visscher
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list