[Haskell-cafe] Re: A rant against the blurb on the Haskell front
ben.franksen at online.de
Sat Oct 16 11:42:26 EDT 2010
Ben Franksen wrote:
>> > That cutting edge research is done for Haskell as well as for its
>> > implementations is of course good to know, but just stating it is
>> > not nearly enough: such a statement must be corroberated with
>> > evidence, otherwise it is just idle marketing. (Not that there
>> > wouldn't be evidence amass, it's just that none is given.)
>> You literally want evidence that research played a part in Haskell, in
>> its opening statement? Why??
> I reject this objection.
Oops, translation error. I wanted to say: I withdraw this objection.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe