[Haskell-cafe] Re: A rant against the blurb on the Haskell front page

[Ben Franksen]

Ben Franksen wrote:
>>     > That cutting edge research is done for Haskell as well as for its
>>     > implementations is of course good to know, but just stating it is
>>     > not nearly enough: such a statement must be corroberated with
>>     > evidence, otherwise it is just idle marketing. (Not that there
>>     > wouldn't be evidence amass, it's just that none is given.)
>> 
>> You literally want evidence that research played a part in Haskell, in
>> its opening statement? Why??
> 
> I reject this objection. 

Oops, translation error. I wanted to say: I withdraw this objection.

Cheers
Ben