[Haskell-cafe] Re: Lambda-case / lambda-if
Simon Marlow
marlowsd at gmail.com
Wed Oct 6 05:39:37 EDT 2010
On 06/10/2010 00:04, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
> On 5 October 2010 17:38, Henning Thielemann
> <schlepptop at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
>> Richard O'Keefe schrieb:
>>
>>> I'd prefer to see something like
>>> \ 1 -> f
>>> | 2 -> g
>>> but I'm sure something could be worked out.
>>
>> In order to be consistent with current case, maybe in layout mode:
>>
>> \1 -> f
>> 2 -> g
>>
>> and in non-layout mode
>>
>> \{1 -> f; 2 -> g}
>
> Duncan Coutts also suggested this possibility to me - once I saw it
> actually liked it rather better than the lambda-case stuff,
> particularly since it generalises nicely to multiple arguments. I may
> try to write a patch for this extension instead when I get some free
> time.
A slightly different suggestion from Simon PJ and myself (we agreed on
something syntax-related :-) is the following:
\case 1 -> f
2 -> g
where the two-token sequence '\ case' introduces a new optional layout
context, the body of which is exactly the same as in a case expression.
So you could also write
\case { 1 -> f; 2 -> g }
if you want. Guards are allowed of course.
The motivation for this syntax is:
* easy to mentally parse: \ still introduces a function.
(better than 'case of' in this respect)
* a bit more noisy than just \: I'm not sure what the
ramifications of having \ introduce a layout context
on its own would be, but I suspect there would be difficulties.
Certainly some existing code would fail to parse, e.g.
(case e of [] -> \x -> x+1; (x:xs) -> \x -> x+2)
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list