[Haskell-cafe] Re: Re: Reply-To: Header in Mailinglists

[Maciej Piechotka]

On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 08:24 +0000, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> > If the mailing list replaced Reply-To header it would required
> > additional effort for responders instead of just pressing reply-to- 
> > all.
> 
> If the list were to add a "Reply-To:" header, but only in the case  
> where one was not already present, that would seem to me to be ideal.   
> (None of the internet polemics against Reply-To that I have seen, have  
> considered this modest suggestion.)
> 

Except... I don't use Reply-To because it defaults to sender so it will
still be breaking the RFC - in most cases (as most people don't set the
Reply-To header).

Regards
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20101122/da84af8c/attachment.bin