[Haskell-cafe] GPL answers from the SFLC (WAS: Re: ANN:
Andrejs.Sisojevs at nextmail.ru
Sat Mar 6 06:52:38 EST 2010
Probably, a considerable part of beginner-programmers (also in our
community), who are interested in GPL ideas, may want to use some similar
GPL clarification: about being "dependent work" is not equal to "derived
I guess, an article in haskell-wiki (clarifying situation with GPL) would be
nice to have.
IMHO they shouldn't equalize terms "dependent" and "deriving" - that's just
Rafael Almeida wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Job Vranish <job.vranish at gmail.com> wrote:
> Linux license specifically single that case out of the license
> restrictions. From the COPYING file in linux's source:
> NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover user programs that use kernel
> services by normal system calls - this is merely considered normal
> of the kernel, and does *not* fall under the heading of "derived
> Also note that the GPL below is copyrighted by the Free Software
> Foundation, but the instance of code that it refers to (the Linux
> kernel) is copyrighted by me and others who actually wrote it.
> Also note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as the kernel
> is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not
> v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GPL-answers-from-the-SFLC-%28WAS%3A-Re%3A-ANN%3A-hakyll-0.1%29-tp27783997p27803729.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe