[Haskell-cafe] GPL answers from the SFLC (WAS: Re: ANN:
magnus at therning.org
Fri Mar 5 03:36:18 EST 2010
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 18:05, Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom
> Hmm, its seems I'm due to eat my hat...
> To me though, the judgement makes that insistence that using an API is
> making a derivative work. I can't see how that squares up.
That has, AFAIU, been the intention of the GPL all along. See e.g.
It also explains why there has been a discussion in the Linux kernel
community about closed source drivers (e.g. nvidia).
The LGPL was, AFAIU, written to explicitly allow a shift of license at
the API level. Without the insistence you point out, GPL and LGPL
would be pretty much the same license.
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
More information about the Haskell-Cafe