[Haskell-cafe] What is Haskell unsuitable for?

[Limestraël]

I would expand your definition of "monadic" to:
"able to syntactically transformed so as to be put in a sequence where an
operation can be altered by the results of the operations preceeding it".
IMO your definition matches more "applicative".

2010/6/18 Alexander Solla <ajs at 2piix.com>

>
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
>  While we're on the topic, does anyone else get funny looks when they say
>> "monads"?
>>
>
> Yes, almost every time.  They seem to catch on if I say "monadic" when I
> mean "able to syntactically transformed so as to be put in a sequence".
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20100619/a6bafe4e/attachment.html