[Haskell-cafe] Difficulties with tagless - create "primitives"
or compose them
Jacques Carette
carette at mcmaster.ca
Sun Jun 13 10:46:35 EDT 2010
Excellent answer! Splitting the Symantics class into pieces is one of
the techniques that we didn't need for solving the original problem
(tagless partial evaluation without resorting to fancy types) that set
us on this track. Which is too bad, because it would have made a nice
addition. The 'typecase pattern', on the other hand, was one of the
explicit techniques we did use.
One of these days, Oleg, Ken and I need to write a follow-up on this, as
the code contains a number of extra techniques (in the advanced partial
evaluation parts) which were not explained in our paper. And, of
course, Oleg's added a number of refinements to the general technique
[see his web site].
I must admit that I find it amusing that most people seem to use
finally-tagless for writing interpreters, while we created it for
partial evaluation and program transformation! [It also allows you to
do certain kinds of program analyses, but one needs additional
techniques to make that comfortable - another thing to write up properly].
Jacques
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list