[Haskell-cafe] Rewriting a famous library and using the same
name: pros and cons
daniel.is.fischer at web.de
Tue Jun 8 14:33:32 EDT 2010
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 20:21:54, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
> Or you just put an upper bound on the versions of the fgl library that
> your program will build against, as you should be doing anyway, and then
> nothing breaks.
Right. At least, nothing breaks until the next compiler release makes the
old library break.
But a new package name wouldn't help with that.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe