[Haskell-cafe] Is 'flip' really necessary?
ozgurakgun at gmail.com
Mon Jul 26 17:55:45 EDT 2010
I think it is pretty cool as well. But I think there is a problem with
viewing it as a wildcard.
let's say we define the following:
(??) = flip
foo :: a -> b -> c
foo ?? x :: a -> c
But saying ?? can be used as a wildcard might in the following wrong
foo x ?? :: b -> c -- WRONG
Just a small concern. Other than that, very neat!
On 26 July 2010 21:42, Nils <ml at n-sch.de> wrote:
> On 26.07.2010 08:33, David Virebayre wrote:
>> listeEtagTot = concatMap (`listeEtagArm` cfgTypesTringle) listeArmOrd
> You can use flip as a "wildcard" aswell:
> > listeEtagTot = concatMap (listeEtagArm `flip` cfgTypesTringle)
> Makes it even more readable in my opinion, since this really "shows" you
> where the value belongs to.
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe