[Haskell-cafe] Is 'flip' really necessary?
dav.vire+haskell at gmail.com
Mon Jul 26 02:33:22 EDT 2010
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Edward Z. Yang <ezyang at mit.edu> wrote:
> An interesting alternate spin on flip is infix notation combined with partial
> application, such as:
> (`foobar` 3)
> which is equivalent to
> \x -> foobar x 3
> I frequently use this, although the jury's out on whether or not it's more readable.
I had HLint suggest me this :
listeEtagTot = concatMap (flip listeEtagArm cfgTypesTringle) listeArmOrd
listeEtagTot = concatMap (`listeEtagArm` cfgTypesTringle) listeArmOrd
More information about the Haskell-Cafe