[Haskell-cafe] Canonical Graphviz code

Felipe Lessa felipe.lessa at gmail.com
Tue Jul 6 19:10:08 EDT 2010

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
<ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com> wrote:
> Felipe Lessa <felipe.lessa at gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm sorry for being silly, but what's the motivation of having this
>> canonic form? =)
> A few things come to mind:
> * Easier to reason about, [...]
> * Less ambiguity: [...]

So you want to do some post-processing to the Dot graph inside
Haskell-land?  Or is it just a pretty printer?  I mean, Dot will
accept both and produce the same result (by definition), so if you
just wanted to draw it then there wouldn't be any difference.

Cheers! :)


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list