[Haskell-cafe] MState: A consistent State monad for concurrent
daniel.is.fischer at web.de
Fri Jul 2 16:37:47 EDT 2010
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
> On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
> > In other words, don't be shy!
> Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
> evalMState :: Forkable m
> => MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate
> -> t -- ^ Initial state value
> -> m a
> This (and run-/execMState) gets rendered incorrectly. "Action to
> evaluate" is completly lost and "Initial state value" has moved one
> upwards to the "MState t m a". Is that a haddock bug or my fault?
Probably Haddock's fault. It had that bug for a while.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe