[Haskell-cafe] Name overloading
Cristiano Paris
cristiano.paris at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 04:10:51 EST 2010
I wish to thank all of you for your comments.
In fact, the solutions you proposed mostly coincided with mine
(including the one using type families) but, in my opinion, they are
more cumbersome than the prefixed names solution.
Going back to my example:
f x = open $ open x
where:
data Foo = { open :: Bar }
data Bar = { open :: String }
there are basically two possibilities to assign types to the "open"
functions, either the first is "open :: Foo -> Bar" and the second is
"open :: Bar -> String" or the converse.
It's clear that the type checker might explore these two possibilities
until one of them typechecks. Hence, the possible outcomes of this
search would be:
1 - No possible assignment works so the typechecking phase fail.
2 - One possibility matches, then it's undertaken.
3 - Two or more possibilities match so an ambiguity is found which can
be solved only by the programmer specifying the type of the open
function explicitly, which is just like using the prefix based
solution.
Would you trust a type checker behaving like this? My answer is no, as
the type checker would be making assumptions about my intentions when
I wrote the expression "open $ open x". I would rather prefer the
compiler to signal this as an error, forcing me to be more explicit
about my real intentions that I could actually find to be wrong (i.e.
a bug would be accepted silently).
Concerning TDNR, I read about it just a while ago but, as far as I can
remember, it's just a syntactic dissertation on the subject while the
type checking matter is not touched.
Thank you again.
C.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Evan Laforge <qdunkan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Now, in Haskell we have type inference, which is "The Good Thing" as
>> it allows to "validate" your program at compile time. Hence, the idea
>> coming up to my mind is that type inference actually forbids a
>> type-directed resolution of names as in C++ or Java.
>>
>> Is this correct?
>
> There is a proposed extension which is not implemented but was
> discussed on the list a while back, maybe you'd find this interesting:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/TypeDirectedNameResolution
>
> Search back in the archives for TDNR and you should turn up some threads.
Cristiano
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list