[Haskell-cafe] Re: lawless instances of Functor
apfelmus at quantentunnel.de
Tue Jan 5 10:16:42 EST 2010
Dan Piponi wrote:
> Derek Elkins wrote:
>> Yes, I have the same problem...Basically, I'm
>> pretty sure the construction of that free theorem doesn't rely on any
>> of the actual details...
> For a long time I've thought such a higher order free theorem must
> exist, and I've mentioned it to a few people, and searched hard for a
> paper on it, but I haven't seen an actual statement and proof.
>> At this point, though, I haven't put
>> much effort into proving that the free theorem holds uniformly
> Well I encourage you to as I've a hunch the correctly generalised
> theorem will be quite pretty. I'd have a go but the style of proof for
> these sorts of things is outside of my domain of
This looks relevant:
Free Theorems Involving Type Constructor Classes.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe