[Haskell-cafe] The instability of Haskell libraries
magnus at therning.org
Sat Apr 24 03:12:52 EDT 2010
On 24/04/10 01:34, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
> Keith Sheppard <keithshep at gmail.com> writes:
>> What Gwern said for 1) and 3)
>>> 2) Not all head repositories are kept stable/buildable at all times.
>> Isn't it bad practice to not have a buildable repo? In any case
>> package owners would be free to use or ignore the data as they like,
>> but I'm pretty sure it would be useful to many.
> I often work on different sub-parts of my packages; as such the interactions
> between them might not work. I don't see why I should ensure that it does,
> as the repository is a _development environment_ not a release.
I don't think anyone will *force* you to behave in a particular way. If you
don't see the use of a service like this one then don't use it. It's really
that simple. The service could even demand opt-in to not waste time/energy on
> That said, there are some projects which generally _are_ buildable/usable
> for their repositories (e.g. XMonad and XMonad-Contrib). But these are
> large multi-person projects with moving targets; the stuff i write is being
> developed by myself only.
Then there are developers like me, who even on small one-man projects try to
keep the official/published repo buildable at all times. I keep my
development environment local or sometimes in an un-advertised repo.
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20100424/e4ac99c2/signature.bin
More information about the Haskell-Cafe