[Haskell-cafe] better way to do this?

[Peter Verswyvelen]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Ketil Malde <ketil at malde.org> wrote:
>
> One could argue that IO should be broken down into a set of "sub-monads"
> encapsulating various subsets of the functionality - file system,
> network access, randomness, and so on.  This could extend the "safe
> spot" to cover much more computational real estate, and effectively
> sandbox programs in various ways.


Yes, a similar and very long thread I unintentionally started  (sorry
for that :p)  was:

DDC compiler and effects; better than Haskell?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/62205