[Haskell-cafe] I read somewhere that for 90% of a wide class of
computing problems, you only need 10% of the source code in Haskell,
that you would in an imperative language.
korpios at korpios.com
Thu Oct 1 12:01:31 EDT 2009
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Andrew Coppin
<andrewcoppin at btinternet.com> wrote:
> It might be a better argument to say that human thinking is fundamentally
> sequential; parallel computers have been around for a little while now...
Perhaps *conscious* human thinking is sequential — yet our brains are
massively parallel processors, and have been around for quite a long
More information about the Haskell-Cafe