[Haskell-cafe] Re: What's the deal with Clean?

Stephen Tetley stephen.tetley at gmail.com
Sun Nov 8 04:22:13 EST 2009

My impression is the saturated-ness that Doaitse speaks of is covered
in Urban Boquist's phd thesis on the GRIN intermediate language -
circa page 31.


As per the code snippet above Clean handles partial application
entirely adequately.

Best wishes


>>> Doaitse Swierstra wrote:
>>> >One of this differences between Haskell and Clean I did not see mentioned in
>> this discussion is that Clean
>>> does not allow so-called partial parametrisation. I.e. all function calls have
>> to be fully saturated

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list