[Haskell-cafe] representing Haskell objects in a uniform way
Daniel Fischer
daniel.is.fischer at web.de
Wed Nov 4 16:26:09 EST 2009
Am Mittwoch 04 November 2009 22:03:09 schrieb Pasqualino "Titto" Assini:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a little IPC system to make Haskell values and functions
> remotely invokable.
>
> To do so, I need (or so I believe) to make my objects accessible via a
> generic interface as in:
>
> class AFun f where
> afun :: Data a => f -> ([Dynamic] -> a)
>
> So my generic object is something that takes an array of parameters,
> that being Dynamic can be anything, and returns a Data, that I can
> easily serialise and send back on the wire.
>
> I start by defining an instance for functions:
>
> instance (Typeable a,AFun b) => AFun (a->b) where
> afun f (p:ps) = let Just v = fromDynamic p in afun (f v) ps
> afun _ _ = error "Too few arguments"
>
> So far so good, but when I try to define an instance for values:
>
> instance Data v => AFun v where
> afun f [] = f
> afun _ _ = error "Too many arguments"
>
> I get:
>
> Couldn't match expected type `a' against inferred type `v'
> `a' is a rigid type variable bound by
> the type signature for `afun'
> at
> /home/titto/.quid2/state/ubuntu.local.8080/wikidata/haskell/package/haskell
>d/src/HaskellD/Test.hs:7:17 `v' is a rigid type variable bound by
> the instance declaration ....
>
>
> Why is that? a and v are both declared to be a Data, why should they not
> match?
afun's type sgnature says "whatever type you (the caller) want, I can give it to you, as
long as it's a member of Data"
But v is one particular type belonging to Data, and it's the only one, the implementation
of afun can provide.
Maybe you want
class (Data a) => AFun f a | f -> a where
afun :: f -> ([Dynamic] -> a)
or, with type families:
class AFun f where
type RType f :: *
afun :: (Data (RType f)) => f -> ([Dynamic] -> RType f)
I'm not quite sure whether that compiles, let alone does what you want, but it might be
worth a try.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list