[Haskell-cafe] hackage version scheme survey

[David Waern]

2009/5/24  <brian at lorf.org>:
> Maybe most of the a.b people are thinking major.minor, and most of the
> a.b.c people are thinking breaking.feature.implementation like the
> "rational" RubyGems scheme described in
> http://rubygems.org/read/chapter/7#page24 , but I don't know. It makes
> it hard to describe dependencies. Will there be a standard versioning
> scheme sometime?

We have one already:

  http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy

David