[Haskell-cafe] DSLs with {in,}equalities

[Henning Thielemann]

On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:

> On 2009 Mar 2, at 23:13, Andrew Hunter wrote:
>> a) Hide Prelude.(<) and define a simple < that builds the AST term I want.
>> b) Come up with a new symbol for it that doesn't look totally awful.
>
> I guess aesthetics differ; I'd use e.g. $<$, where the $ (to me, from other 
> contexts) means "symbolic".

... like escaping '<' in LaTeX. Funny!