Thomas Davie tom.davie at gmail.com
Sat Jan 24 01:49:30 EST 2009

```On 24 Jan 2009, at 02:33, Luke Palmer wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:10 PM, <roconnor at theorem.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Derek Elkins wrote:
>
> mempty `mappend` undefined = undefined (left identity monoid law)
> The above definition doesn't meet this, similarly for the right
> identity
> monoid law.  That only leaves one definition, () `mappend` () = ()
> which
> does indeed satisfy the monoid laws.
>
> So the answer to the question is "Yes."  Another example of making
> things as lazy as possible going astray.
>
> I'd like to argue that laws, such as monoid laws, do not apply to
> partial values.  But I haven't thought my position through yet.
>

I'd actually argue that this is just the wrong way of formulating my
statement.  Please correct my possibly ill informed maths, if Im doin
it rong though...

Isn't the point of bottom that it's the least defined value.  Someone
above made the assertion that for left identity to hold, _|_ `mappend`
() must be _|_.  But, as there is only one value in the Unit type, all
values we have no information about must surely be that value, so this
is akin to saying () `mappend` () must be (), which our definition
gives us.

Bob
```