[Haskell-cafe] Why monoids will abide...
newsham at lava.net
Thu Jan 22 12:54:24 EST 2009
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Eugene Kirpichov wrote:
> To my mind, in the map-reduce case you generally need a commutative
> monoid. Or, you need an extra infrastructure that mappend's only
> results from adjacent machines, or something like that.
analyzes the model of Google's MapReduce and Sawzall. quick haskell
The MapReduce model isn't based directly on a monoid, but the Sawzall
More information about the Haskell-Cafe