[Haskell-cafe] Comments from OCaml Hacker Brian Hurt
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Sun Jan 18 08:57:07 EST 2009
On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 13:36 -0800, David Leimbach wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:16 AM, david48 <dav.vire+haskell at gmail.com>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:08 PM, David Leimbach
> <leimy2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> > So you're saying it should be better documented in Haskell
> what a Monoid is.
> > Did you say you searched for "C++ class" why not "Haskell
> Monoid" then?
> > The first correct google hit that didn't think I meant
> Monads, takes you
> > straight to the GHC documentation for Data.Monoid.
> Read my first post on the thread, that's exactly what I did
> ( and then
> complained that the doc for Data.Monoid was close to useless )
> Sorry missed it! This is an exceptionally long thread! :-) I agree
> Data.Monoid's docs don't give you much to work with.
Do you think they look better now:
Any other improvements you'd make?
More information about the Haskell-Cafe