[Haskell-cafe] Re: Monads aren't evil

[minh thu]

I always thought that instead of having two classes of characters, one
for variable (and function) names and the
other for operators, only the first charater of the identifier could
mean it's one or the others,
so *vec or +point would be valid operator names and thus >_> too. And
C++ could be a Data type name...

Cheers,
Thu

2009/1/11 Jason Dusek <jason.dusek at gmail.com>:
>  It is really too bad we can not define the operators
>
>    >_>  ^_^  <_<
>
>  These are significant from an internationalization standpoint;
>  and they'd make the language so much more competitiveI
>  vis-a-vis LOLCode.
>
> --
> Jason Dusek
>
>
>
> 2009/1/10 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <allbery at ece.cmu.edu>:
>> On 2009 Jan 10, at 15:19, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
>>
>> h3 x = f x <^(+)^> g x
>>
>> Is that an operator or Batman?
>> (yes, I know, 3 operators)
>> --
>> brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery at kf8nh.com
>> system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
>> electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university    KF8NH
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>