[Haskell-cafe] speed: ghc vs gcc vs jhc
bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 18:24:59 EST 2009
Saturday, February 21, 2009, 2:14:25 AM, you wrote:
> Heh. He probably meant something more like "jhc is not a production
> compiler" which is true for a lot of projects. For projects of
> substantial size or that require many extensions, jhc falls somewhat
> short. It is getting better though. Of course, help is always
> appreciated. :)
what is "substantial size"? can jhc be used for video codec, i.e.
probably no extensions - just raw computations, and thousands or tens
of thousands LOCs?
Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
More information about the Haskell-Cafe