[Haskell-cafe] "first class" tuples?
lennart at augustsson.net
Tue Feb 17 08:59:56 EST 2009
Look at the HList stuff by Oleg and others and you'll find the kind of
tuples you suggest.
2009/2/17 Peter Verswyvelen <bugfact at gmail.com>:
> Tuples in Haskell always have annoyed me a bit since each tuple of different
> dimension is hardcoded (I guess compilers enforce a maximum dimension on
> Since a tuple represents a fixed size data structure with different types at
> each coordinate, it feels as it should be possible to have a couple of type
> and data constructors to build a tuple, and to use recursion at the type
> level to have functions operate on tuples of any dimension.
> E.g. one could then have a tmap function that takes a tuple of functions and
> a tuple of values and applies the function at coordinate N to the value at
> coordinate N.
> Is something like this possible today in Haskell, e.g. using new features
> like type families, GADTs, template haskell, etc? Or do we need dependent
> types for it?
> In C++x0 I believe it is now possible to do so, since they even allow a
> variable number of template arguments, using recursion at compile time (see
> e.g. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/comphelp/v9v111/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.xlcpp9.aix.doc/standlib/header_tuple.htm )
> Grapefruit has something like first class records, so I guess it should be
> possible (and simpler) to do this for tuples?
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-Cafe