[Haskell-cafe] Functional GUIs again

[Fraser Wilson]

The current darcs version now mentions the 0.9.13 dependency.  I don't see a
nice way of supporting both 0.9.13 and 0.10.0, so I'll take the plunge and
do a destructive upgrade.  As you say, the new model/view is much nicer (and
of course I shall be stealing liberally from it).

cheers,
Fraser.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Peter Verswyvelen <bugfact at gmail.com>wrote:

> Okay, you used 0.9.13, that explains the errors yes, the model/view thing
> is different in 0.10.0 (better IMHO)
> Yes it would be nice if it worked with GTK2HS 0.10.0, but it might be
> tricky to support both version, I don't know.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Fraser Wilson <blancolioni at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I haven't tried to compile with 0.10.0 but I can guess that the errors
>> arise from the use of ListStore. I'm not sure what the best approach is
>> here. Is 0.9.13 over now?  If so, then I'll upgrade and fix it.
>>
>> For now it would certainly make sense to put the dependency into the cabal
>> file, which I'm ashamed to say never occorred to me.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Fraser
>>
>> On 17 feb 2009, at 00:29, Peter Verswyvelen <bugfact at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> That's some great hacking you did :-)
>>
>> What version of GTK2HS did you use? I get various compiler errors when
>> using the latest GTK2HS 0.10.0.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/2/16 Fraser Wilson < <blancolioni at gmail.com>blancolioni at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Now that I re-read my email, it looks like I'm saying "Username
>>> requested" in the sense of "OK, Cafe people, treat this as a user name
>>> request and step to it."  What I meant was that I have requested a username
>>> (via the email), and once I have an account I'll put it on hackage.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the confusion.
>>>
>>> Also, a patch that derives the Monoid instance for Style has been
>>> pushed.  Let me explain why I love this mailing list.  I hadn't really
>>> looked at Monoids, but then their utility fell out of the recent discussion
>>> about whether they should be called Monoids or ... whatever the other name
>>> was.  And now I see them all over the place, and I'm a better person for it.
>>>
>>> Surely this is too much to be considered actual programming!
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Fraser.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Duncan Coutts <<duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk>
>>> duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:30 +0100, Fraser Wilson wrote:
>>>> > You must have missed the bit about "congenitally lazy" :-)
>>>> >
>>>> > Username requested ...
>>>>
>>>> See <http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/accounts.html>
>>>> http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/accounts.html
>>>>
>>>> All you need to do is email Ross and ask.
>>>>
>>>> Duncan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> <http://thewhitelion.org/mysister>http://thewhitelion.org/mysister
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>>>  <Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org>Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>>>  <http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe>
>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
http://thewhitelion.org/mysister
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20090217/5f731e52/attachment-0001.htm