[Haskell-cafe] Formal semantics for Haskell?

Tim Newsham newsham at lava.net
Mon Feb 9 12:37:27 EST 2009


> ML has a formal definition[1]; why not Haskell?  Would this be a Good Thing,
> or a Waste Of Time?

Not exactly what you are asking for, but a start:
http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/1992/123/index.html

> gregg

Tim Newsham
http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list