[Haskell-cafe] Re: Why binding to existing widget toolkits doesn't make any sense

[John A. De Goes]

Perhaps I should have been more precise:

How do you define "layout" and "interaction semantics" in such a way  
that the former has a *necessarily* direct, enormous impact on the  
latter?

HTML/CSS is a perfect example of how one can decouple a model of  
content from the presentation of that content. The developer writes  
the content model and the controller, while UX guys or designers get  
to decide how it looks.

Regards,

John A. De Goes
N-BRAIN, Inc.
The Evolution of Collaboration

http://www.n-brain.net    |    877-376-2724 x 101

On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Achim Schneider wrote:

> "John A. De Goes" <john at n-brain.net> wrote:
>
>> How do you define "layout" in a way that has a "direct an enormous
>> effect on interaction semantics"???
>>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faJ8N0giqzw
>
>
> -- 
> (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
> for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
> performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe