DDC compiler and effects;
better than Haskell? (was Re: [Haskell-cafe] unsafeDestructiveAssign?)
ok at cs.otago.ac.nz
Sun Aug 16 19:32:13 EDT 2009
On Aug 15, 2009, at 2:55 PM, John A. De Goes wrote:
>> If you don't like the file system, consider mutable memory. An
>> effect system will tell me I can safely update two pieces of non-
>> overlapping, contiguous memory concurrently, even in different
>> threads if the complexity so justifies it. The IO monad is a poor
>> man's solution to the problem of effects.
In the presence of out-of-order memory writes, write buffers,
caches, &c, I'm not going to contradict you, but it certainly
isn't as _obvious_ as it used to be.
I've come across an experimental microprocessor where I _think_
it isn't safe if you have
data 1 | data 2
whether that's so on any other processor is beyond my expertise.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe