[Haskell-cafe] Re: Thinking about what's missing in our library coverage

[Don Stewart]

gale:
> Other "batteries included" platforms contain
> various tools for processing markup that are
> far less general than pandoc. This is a place
> where Haskell can shine.
> 
> So yes, pandoc should definitely be included
> in the platform. All that said, though, I will
> certainly agree that it is not currently in the top 5.
> 

I agree with this. We would shine, but maybe not for the first cut.
Especially since the maintainer has requested this.

Note also: pandoc is GPL

-- Don