[Haskell-cafe] Haskell/JS -- better through typeclasses?
jason.dusek at gmail.com
Sun Apr 26 12:18:33 EDT 2009
2009/04/26 John A. De Goes <john at n-brain.net>:
> I can't speak for Jason, but for me, this is not very useful.
> I don't want to write in a Haskell DSL, I want to write in
> Haskell. And not the whole program, either, just the parts
> that really lend themselves to functional programming
> (parsers, numeric computations, code generators, various
> algorithms). Which means I need to be able to call Haskell
This was what I was originally writing in about, yeah.
However, thinking it over I realize there are some serious
problems. We really do want to work with a restricted subset
of Haskell that is more amenable to translation -- one with
finite arrays and most every type translatable to JSON.
> I'm not particularly concerned with non-strict evaluation,
> either. Strict is preferable wherever it would not alter the
I fear that requires us to know, statically, whether
potentially infinite structures like lists are finite or
infinite. I'm not sure about this but I suspect that's a major
More information about the Haskell-Cafe