[Haskell-cafe] Re: 'par' - why has it the type a -> b -> b ?

[Henning Thielemann]

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Sean Leather wrote:

>>> (\x y -> y)
>>
>> *shudder*
>>
>> I just can't stand such things.
>>
>
> What is it that you can't stand? Would you prefer "flip const"?

No, certainly "const id". :-)