[Haskell-cafe] Re: 'par' - why has it the type a -> b -> b ?

[Achim Schneider]

"Sean Leather" <leather at cs.uu.nl> wrote:

> > > (\x y -> y)
> >
> > *shudder*
> >
> > I just can't stand such things.
> >
> 
> What is it that you can't stand? Would you prefer "flip const"?
> 
It's the missing "x" on the right side. Makes my internal C compiler
ache.


-- 
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.