[Haskell-cafe] packages and QuickCheck
conal at conal.net
Wed Sep 10 06:12:17 EDT 2008
If I do foo and foo-test, then I would probably place foo-test on Hackage.
Alternatively, just give foo a pointer to the location of the foo-test darcs
repo location. But then it might not be easy for users to keep the versions
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Wolfgang Jeltsch <
g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. September 2008 16:05 schrieb Conal Elliott:
> > […]
> > > > My current leaning is to split a package "foo" into packages "foo"
> > > > and "foo-test"
> > >
> > > What benefit does this provide?
> > It keeps the library and its dependencies small.
> Do you publish foo-test on Hackage? If yes than the HackageDB gets
> with test packages. If not, there is no easy way for users to run your
> > […]
> Best wishes,
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe