[Haskell-cafe] Re: the Haskell notion of class vis-a-vis universal
barsoap at web.de
Thu Oct 23 04:59:06 EDT 2008
"Galchin, Vasili" <vigalchin at gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the relationship of a Haskell class to universal
> algebra? (a refresher ...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_algebra) ... it seems that all
> types that belong to a class are models? E.g. all "monads" have to
> satisfy the "monad laws" stated in the Monad class, i.e. equational
Nah, Haskell isn't that strong, it only ensures type integrity, not the
laws themselves. Doing that isn't decidable in the genaral case as
it'd require source analysis, at least with the current state of types.
I better not attempt to answer the rest as I'm way to far off my home
turf. Ask Jonathan.
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe