[Haskell-cafe] Re: Hmm, what license to use?

[Magnus Therning]

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:31 AM, brian <brianchina60221 at gmail.com> wrote:
[..]
> as big a problem as I imagined. My understanding is that I can satisfy
> the requirements of the LGPL by dynamically linking, and that's
> already happening. Is there something else to worry about? I'd be in
> violation if I shipped something statically linked, but cabal doesn't
> seem inclined to do that by default.

I'm not sure I understand you here.  Would you clarify your words
here, bearing in mind that GHC doesn't do dynamic linking of Haskell
modules?

Cheers,
M

-- 
Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org          Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe