[Haskell-cafe] Good name for this operator?

[Ariel J. Birnbaum]

On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 16:23 -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ariel J. Birnbaum <valgarv at gmx.net> wrote:
> > When working with Applicative, I often find myself defining and using
> > this operator:
> >
> > (<%>) :: (Applicative f) => f (a -> b) -> a -> f b
> > f <%> x = f <*> pure x
> 
> Yeah, me too.

So how does one go about asking for its inclusion in
Control.Applicative? We might as well agree on a common name for it...

-- 
Ariel J. Birnbaum