[Haskell-cafe] Re: Control.Exception.evaluate - 'correct
definition' not so correct
Janis Voigtlaender
voigt at tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de
Mon May 19 03:31:18 EDT 2008
Ariel J. Birnbaum wrote:
> (considering "undefined" as equivalent to "const undefined", which iirc was
> the definition of _|_ for function types).
>
> What am I missing?
undefined /= const undefined
in Haskell, due to seq.
--
Dr. Janis Voigtlaender
http://wwwtcs.inf.tu-dresden.de/~voigt/
mailto:voigt at tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list