On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Alfonso Acosta <alfonso.acosta at gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, considering how often is (putStrLn.show) used, it is surprising > that there is no Ln variant for print (just like it happens with > putStr and putStrLn) Actually, > print = putStrLn . show so > outputLines i = mapM_ print [1..i] -- Felipe.