[Haskell-cafe] Polymorphic QuickCheck arguments
hpacheco at gmail.com
Tue Jun 17 15:51:09 EDT 2008
You are right!
If I try to compile it, then it complains about a Show instance for a, what
in fact forces a monomorphic type signature for t.
I have found under Test.Quickcheck.Poly a way to generate Int values for a
polymorphic type, but because it requires an abstraction Poly a for some
type a I do not see how it can improve.
What it concretely states the module is
- This is the basic pseudo-polymorphic object.
- The idea is you can't cheat, and use the integer
- directly, but need to use the abstraction.
Is it possible to cheat? I would like to...
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Sebastiaan Visser <sfvisser at cs.uu.nl>
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Hugo Pacheco wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> There is something about polymorphic tests in QuickCheck that I do not
>> If you write the simplest dummy test function
>> tst :: a -> Bool
>> tst _ = True
>> and evaluate it we get
>> > verboseCheck tst
> How come did the polymorphic value a get instanciated to ()? Is this done
>> via the Testable type class?
>> Could someone please explain this to me? I'm not saying it does not make
>> sense, but I would like to understand how it works. Being possible to change
>> this behavior, this is, assign another "default type" whenever polymorphic
>> types occur, would be awesome.
> I think it is GHCi that is instantiating the type with (). Try compiling
> the program, it will probably be rejected by the compiler when you do not
> specify a concrete type.
> You can, for example, try this:
> verboseCheck (tst :: [Int] -> Bool)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe