[Haskell-cafe] Re: Optimizing 'sequence'
dons at galois.com
Wed Jul 23 13:48:23 EDT 2008
> Chaddaï Fouché <chaddai.fouche <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > 2008/7/22 Luke Palmer <lrpalmer <at> gmail.com>:
> > > A little formal reasoning reveals that sequence1 = sequence2 exactly
> > > when (>>=) is strict in its left argument. There are four common
> > > monads which are _not_: Identity, Reader, Writer, State (and RWS by
> > > extension).
> > Still if that makes that much of a difference, maybe we could envision
> > putting a sequence' in the library ?
> Yes, in my experiments this is to be or not to be. Stack space is limited.
> Also processing time goes down by 800%, so it is a big deal sometimes.
> Incomplete list of functions affected:
> As far as I know sequence could be specialized to IO monad and use my
> How do I reason if >>= for parsers is lazy in its first argument?
How about adding
for the strict package?
More information about the Haskell-Cafe