[Haskell-cafe] Re: Why purely in haskell?
lennart at augustsson.net
Fri Jan 11 10:25:55 EST 2008
That would give you a language with a semantics I don't want to touch.
Sometimes useful, yes, but far to intensional for my taste.
On Jan 11, 2008 5:59 AM, Achim Schneider <barsoap at web.de> wrote:
> Yes, thanks. I actually do think that many things would be easier if
> every recursion would be translated to its fixpoint, making the term
> tree completely finite and defining y internal, as it's arcane, black
> (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
> past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
> hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
> signature prohibited.
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe