[Haskell-cafe] Re: Why purely in haskell?

Achim Schneider barsoap at web.de
Thu Jan 10 10:36:30 EST 2008

jerzy.karczmarczuk at info.unicaen.fr wrote:

> Niko Korhonen writes: 
> ...
> > Although it could be argued that laziness is the cause of some very 
> > obscure bugs... <g> 
> > Niko
> Example, PLEASE. 
[1..] == [1..]

, for assumed operational semantics of ones own axiomatic semantics.
Bugs are only a misunderstanding away.

(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
signature prohibited. 

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list