[Haskell-cafe] Why purely in haskell?
ithika at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 10:06:55 EST 2008
On 09/01/2008, Yu-Teh Shen <shenyute at gmail.com> wrote:
> I got question about why haskell insist to be a purely FL. I mean is
> there any feature which is only support by pure?
Have a look at the ueber-retrospective on Haskell, fifty-five pages of
all the history and motivation one could possibly want.
It's interesting reading, I promise! ;-)
dougal at dougalstanton.net // http://www.dougalstanton.net
More information about the Haskell-Cafe