[Haskell-cafe] Why purely in haskell?

Dougal Stanton ithika at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 10:06:55 EST 2008

On 09/01/2008, Yu-Teh Shen <shenyute at gmail.com> wrote:
> I got question about why haskell insist to be a purely FL. I mean is
> there any feature which is only support by pure?

Have a look at the ueber-retrospective on Haskell, fifty-five pages of
all the history and motivation one could possibly want.


It's interesting reading, I promise! ;-)

Dougal Stanton
dougal at dougalstanton.net // http://www.dougalstanton.net

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list