[Haskell-cafe] Wikipedia on first-class object
bf3 at telenet.be
Sun Jan 6 17:52:29 EST 2008
> The relational syntax of Prolog is more "universal" than the functional
> notation, since you have logic variables and logical-non-determinism, and
Isn't this just because mathematically, a function *is* a relation, but not vice versa? A relation being just a subset of a Cartesian product of sets, while a function being a special kind of relation for which each element in the domain has exactly one image? So relations are inherently much more universal than functions, but they are not that practical to work with (for a computer and/or human?).
Gee, I should not talk about math here, as you "category theory" guys know a thousand times more math than I do ;-)
More information about the Haskell-Cafe