Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 16:12 schrieb Jules Bean:
> And indeed there *will* be a Monad, if there is a sensible way of
> defining concat :: b (b a) -> b a, which there probably is.
Not with sets. “concat” on Set would have type
Ord a => Set (Set a) -> Set a
instead of
Set (Set a) -> Set a.
Best wishes,
Wolfgang