[Haskell-cafe] A handy little consequence of the Cont monad

[Philip Armstrong]

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:19:17PM +0000, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
>   It's a matter of taste.  I prefer the function composition in this case.
>   It reads nicely as a pipeline.

(Hoping not to contribute to any flamage...)

I've always liked $ for this kind of code, if you want to keep the
arguments around:

   next xs = runCont $ sequence $ map Cont xs

seems quite natural to me.

Phil

-- 
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt